[
http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/DOXIA-123?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_101945
]
Lukas Theussl commented on DOXIA-123:
-------------------------------------
I know doxia is still alpha but we are about to change that ... ;)
The question is, should every xdoc that was valid in m1 also be valid in m2
(even if not all features are implemented)? Or in other words, if someone
provides us, some time in the future, with an implementation of escapeXml and
navbar, should we accept it as a new feature or reject it categorically? If we
allow it in principle then it should go into the DTD. I guess that the effect
of both can be mimicked by some macro, so it's not necessary to have them. I
also think we should remove them, for the sake of simplicity, but we should be
clear about it, because users will always come up with some "... but it should
be possible to do that..."... :)
> Create an xdoc dtd for maven 2
> ------------------------------
>
> Key: DOXIA-123
> URL: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/DOXIA-123
> Project: doxia
> Issue Type: Task
> Components: Module - Xdoc
> Reporter: Lukas Theussl
>
> In Maven 1, a valid xdoc was defined to be something that was converted into
> a valid xhtml document by the m1 xdoc plugin. I guess in m2 the same
> procedure should be applied to doxia. We need to identify the features that
> 1) should be added 2) should be removed with respect to the m1 xdoc dtd.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators:
http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
