kwin commented on code in PR #125:
URL: 
https://github.com/apache/maven-doxia-sitetools/pull/125#discussion_r1440639693


##########
doxia-integration-tools/pom.xml:
##########
@@ -86,9 +86,15 @@
       <scope>provided</scope>
     </dependency>
     <dependency>
-      <groupId>org.apache.maven</groupId>
-      <artifactId>maven-plugin-api</artifactId>
-      <version>${mavenVersion}</version>
+      <groupId>org.eclipse.aether</groupId>
+      <artifactId>aether-api</artifactId>
+      <version>${aetherVersion}</version>
+      <scope>provided</scope>
+    </dependency>
+    <dependency>
+      <groupId>org.eclipse.aether</groupId>
+      <artifactId>aether-impl</artifactId>

Review Comment:
   It is a transitive dependency of `maven-core` and `maven-aether-provider` 
(the latter also being a transitive dependency of maven-core). I don't know how 
the 
<https://maven.apache.org/plugins/maven-dependency-plugin/analyze-mojo.htm>l 
with https://maven.apache.org/shared/maven-dependency-analyzer/ concludes that 
this is necessary (couldn't bring it to log the referencing class) but IMHO it 
isn't. @michael-o Any idea how to make the output of m-dependency-p more 
verbose in this regard?



-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org

Reply via email to