[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MNG-8097?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17837664#comment-17837664
 ] 

Tamas Cservenak commented on MNG-8097:
--------------------------------------

You again mix things:
 * type is for consumers. In jackrabbit, when consuming just declare the 
dependency type of "zip" and be done with it.
 * when building you declare packaging "content-package"

Do not try to enforce packaging on consumer side, or type on producer side as 
it makes no sense.

> Validate that each dependency->type is a type registered in an artifact 
> handler
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: MNG-8097
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MNG-8097
>             Project: Maven
>          Issue Type: New Feature
>            Reporter: Konrad Windszus
>            Priority: Major
>
> Currently often the dependency's type is being set to the extension and the 
> resolution is lenient, i.e. if there is no artifact handler defining the 
> value given in {{dependency->type}} resolution transparently uses the type as 
> extension.
> That can potentially lead to two issues:
> 1. Resolution might fail with surprising error messages like
> {code}
> Could not resolve dependencies for project ....: The following artifacts 
> could not be resolved: <gav>: Could not transfer artifact 
> <groupId>:<artifactId>:<unknown-type>:<version> from/to ...
> {code}
> This is an issue for all types not defined by Maven Core itself, e.g. for 
> https://jackrabbit.apache.org/filevault-package-maven-plugin/index.html which 
> registers an artifact handler for type {{content-package}} with extension 
> {{zip}}.
> 2. The information {{addedToClasspath}} and {{includesDependencies}} from the 
> artifact handler is not evaluated



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)

Reply via email to