[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MJAVADOC-797?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17958194#comment-17958194
]
Olivier Lamy commented on MJAVADOC-797:
---------------------------------------
This project has moved from Jira to GitHub Issues. This issue was migrated to
[apache/maven-javadoc-plugin#1171|https://github.com/apache/maven-javadoc-plugin/issues/1171].
Please visit the GitHub issue to view further activity, add comments, or
subscribe to receive notifications.
> Exclusion rules works differently for Java 8 and Java 11
> --------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: MJAVADOC-797
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MJAVADOC-797
> Project: Maven Javadoc Plugin (Moved to GitHub Issues)
> Issue Type: Bug
> Affects Versions: 3.7.0
> Reporter: Maksim Timonin
> Priority: Major
>
> The behavior of the "-excludePackageNames" differs for java8 and java11 in
> case of using an option "-subpackages".
> Reproducer is available in the PR:
> [1] [https://github.com/apache/maven-javadoc-plugin/pull/289]
> There are possibly, 2 bugs:
> 1. Behavior for "excludePackageNames" is actually depends on whether the
> "subpackages" setting is specified or not - there are different patterns for
> exclusion used, see patterns in *JavadocUtil#getExcludedPackages* and
> *JavadocUtil#getIncludedFiles*
> 2. In case of using "subpackages" the scenario in the PR [1], the plugin
> prepares equal options for the javadoc util for both java versions. But
> actually the output for the javadoc util differs (depends on the java
> version). I'm not sure is it an expected behavior for the javadoc util, but
> I'd expect the maven-javadoc-plugin will adjust for different java versions
> and provides equal exclusion result.
>
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)
