[ http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNG-3313?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_118702 ]
Vincent Siveton commented on MNG-3313: -------------------------------------- Did you check these plugins in the mojo land? http://mojo.codehaus.org/nbm-maven-plugin/ http://mojo.codehaus.org/netbeans-freeform-maven-plugin/ > NetBeans projects, more than ant project, more than free form project. > ----------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: MNG-3313 > URL: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNG-3313 > Project: Maven 2 > Issue Type: New Feature > Components: Dependencies, Design, Patterns & Best Practices, IDEs, > POM > Reporter: Imre Tabur > Priority: Critical > > Is better to have maven (plugin) that generates correct NetBeans project, not > only ANT free form project: > 1)Including information about what type project it is - ear, war, jar > 2)Correct Source/Binary format by POM - right now it desn't generate correct > source level! > 3)Recursively resolved dependencies packages for project for compile, build, > test > 4)maven source tree > layout(http://maven.apache.org/guides/introduction/introduction-to-the-standard-directory-layout.html) > must accept also other source layouts like default NetBeans layout or any > other what users/developers do . Maven can't be dominant at this point, > because people cant always remake theirs projects by maven needs. If we > compare rpm/yum, deb/apt systems with maven, then maven tries to be dominant > - all things must be done this way how maven accept it, but deb/rpm > conception says: "We accept developers(users) packages and we can build users > sources, we don't need special layout for that!". -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/Administrators.jspa - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira