[
http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MSITE-129?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=165410#action_165410
]
Per Lindfors commented on MSITE-129:
------------------------------------
??The structure you have drawn as 'what it should be' is stating that the
submodules inherit from myproj, which they dont. And thats why in the generated
site they dont live under it.??
bq. Yes I know. What I'm trying to say is that it would be nice if the
site-plugin could handle the modules of myproj the same way it does when the
modules inherit from myproj.
??You did deploy the projects to check that the module links were woerking
didnt you? They will never work in an undeployed state.??
bq. Yes.
> modules list empty if modules don't use this project as parent in reactor
> build
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: MSITE-129
> URL: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MSITE-129
> Project: Maven 2.x Site Plugin
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: multi module
> Affects Versions: 2.0-beta-5
> Reporter: Kenney Westerhof
> Assignee: Dennis Lundberg
> Priority: Minor
> Fix For: 2.0
>
>
> The code in the AbstractSiteRenderingMojo does the following:
> - if it's running in a reactor build (i.e. more than 1 project in the reactor
> projects) it scans all
> projects to see if it's parent project equals the current project. If so,
> it's marked as a module.
> - if it's running on a single project, the project.build.modules is consulted
> and those modules
> are marked as modules.
> I've got a 'fake' root pom, for utility purposes: it lists all projects as
> modules so that I can easily
> built everything and generate a site. However, this fake root pom is never
> used as a parent - there's
> a /pom/pom.xml project for that.
> The result of this is that the modules list is empty.
> A workaround is to first run 'mvn site' and then 'mvn site -N'.
> I'm not sure what the correct solution should be - basically now 2 site
> layouts are implemented:
> - a physical layout where the modules match the <modules> section of the pom,
> reflecting filesystem layout,
> - a project hierarchy layout based on <parent>
> and one or the other is used depending on wheter the build contains more than
> 1 project or not.
> My first feeling is that since the tag is called ${modules} (or <menu
> ref="modules"/>) that
> the site should use the <modules>, not the <parent>.
> It should also take into consideration, that IF a reactor build is running,
> it should only use the modules that are also
> in the reactor (so you can use -r -Dmaven.reactor.excludes=.. to generate a
> site with not all projects in it).
> Thoughts?
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators:
http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
