issues  

Messages by Thread

• • Re: [PR] Use PowerShell instead of WMIC for detecting zombie process on Windows [maven-surefire] via GitHub
• [PR] Javadoc fixes [maven-compiler-plugin] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Javadoc fixes [maven-compiler-plugin] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Javadoc fixes [maven-compiler-plugin] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] Consumer POM of multi-module project should exclude <build> and <dependencies> elements [maven] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Consumer POM of multi-module project should exclude <build> and <dependencies> elements [maven] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Consumer POM of multi-module project should exclude <build> and <dependencies> elements [maven] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Consumer POM of multi-module project should exclude <build> and <dependencies> elements [maven] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Consumer POM of multi-module project should exclude <build> and <dependencies> elements [maven] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Consumer POM of multi-module project should exclude <build> and <dependencies> elements [maven] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Consumer POM of multi-module project should exclude <build> and <dependencies> elements [maven] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Consumer POM of multi-module project should exclude <build> and <dependencies> elements [maven] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Consumer POM of multi-module project should exclude <build> and <dependencies> elements [maven] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Consumer POM of multi-module project should exclude <build> and <dependencies> elements [maven] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Consumer POM of multi-module project should exclude <build> and <dependencies> elements [maven] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Consumer POM of multi-module project should exclude <build> and <dependencies> elements [maven] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Consumer POM of multi-module project should exclude <build> and <dependencies> elements [maven] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Consumer POM of multi-module project should exclude <build> and <dependencies> elements [maven] via GitHub
  • [PR] Consumer POM of multi-module project should exclude <build> and <dependencies> elements [maven] via GitHub
• Re: [I] after migration from jdk17 to jdk21 junit is failing and ignoring surefire arling arguments for --add-open java.lang and junit fails throwing InaccessbleObjectException [maven] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] Reorder cases to avoid skipping [maven-compiler-plugin] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Reorder cases to avoid skipping [maven-compiler-plugin] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Reorder cases to avoid skipping [maven-compiler-plugin] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] Document deprecation of Language.SCRIPT [maven] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Document deprecation of Language.SCRIPT [maven] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Document deprecation of Language.SCRIPT [maven] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Document deprecation of Language.SCRIPT [maven] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Document deprecation of Language.SCRIPT [maven] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Document deprecation of Language.SCRIPT [maven] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] [MCOMPILER-1006] Fix <proc>only</proc> not triggering annotation processors [maven-compiler-plugin] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [MCOMPILER-1006] Fix <proc>only</proc> not triggering annotation processors [maven-compiler-plugin] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [MCOMPILER-1006] Fix <proc>only</proc> not triggering annotation processors [maven-compiler-plugin] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [MCOMPILER-1006] Fix <proc>only</proc> not triggering annotation processors [maven-compiler-plugin] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] Use junit platform runner to run junit 3, junit 4 and TestNG tests via vintage engine and testng engine [maven-surefire] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Use junit platform runner to run junit 3, junit 4 and TestNG tests via vintage engine and testng engine [maven-surefire] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Use junit platform runner to run junit 3, junit 4 and TestNG tests via vintage engine and testng engine [maven-surefire] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Use junit platform runner to run junit 3, junit 4 and TestNG tests via vintage engine and testng engine [maven-surefire] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Use junit platform runner to run junit 3, junit 4 and TestNG tests via vintage engine and testng engine [maven-surefire] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Use junit platform runner to run junit 3, junit 4 and TestNG tests via vintage engine and testng engine [maven-surefire] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Use junit platform runner to run junit 3, junit 4 and TestNG tests via vintage engine and testng engine [maven-surefire] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Use junit platform runner to run junit 3, junit 4 and TestNG tests via vintage engine and testng engine [maven-surefire] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] [MSHARED-938] [maven-shared-utils] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] [#620] Add support for optional attach parameter to disable artifact attachment [maven-jlink-plugin] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [#620] Add support for optional attach parameter to disable artifact attachment [maven-jlink-plugin] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [#620] Add support for optional attach parameter to disable artifact attachment [maven-jlink-plugin] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [#620] Add support for optional attach parameter to disable artifact attachment [maven-jlink-plugin] via GitHub
• Re: [I] Surefire and Failsafe stop working on latest versions of Windows due to missing wmic [maven-surefire] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Surefire and Failsafe stop working on latest versions of Windows due to missing wmic [maven-surefire] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Surefire and Failsafe stop working on latest versions of Windows due to missing wmic [maven-surefire] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Surefire and Failsafe stop working on latest versions of Windows due to missing wmic [maven-surefire] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Surefire and Failsafe stop working on latest versions of Windows due to missing wmic [maven-surefire] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Surefire and Failsafe stop working on latest versions of Windows due to missing wmic [maven-surefire] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Surefire and Failsafe stop working on latest versions of Windows due to missing wmic [maven-surefire] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Surefire and Failsafe stop working on latest versions of Windows due to missing wmic [maven-surefire] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Surefire and Failsafe stop working on latest versions of Windows due to missing wmic [maven-surefire] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Surefire and Failsafe stop working on latest versions of Windows due to missing wmic [maven-surefire] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Surefire and Failsafe stop working on latest versions of Windows due to missing wmic [maven-surefire] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Surefire and Failsafe stop working on latest versions of Windows due to missing wmic [maven-surefire] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Surefire and Failsafe stop working on latest versions of Windows due to missing wmic [maven-surefire] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Surefire and Failsafe stop working on latest versions of Windows due to missing wmic [maven-surefire] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Surefire and Failsafe stop working on latest versions of Windows due to missing wmic [maven-surefire] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Surefire and Failsafe stop working on latest versions of Windows due to missing wmic [maven-surefire] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Surefire and Failsafe stop working on latest versions of Windows due to missing wmic [maven-surefire] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Surefire and Failsafe stop working on latest versions of Windows due to missing wmic [maven-surefire] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Surefire and Failsafe stop working on latest versions of Windows due to missing wmic [maven-surefire] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Surefire and Failsafe stop working on latest versions of Windows due to missing wmic [maven-surefire] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] Remove redundant argument [maven-shared-utils] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] Prefer StringBuilder for local variables [maven-shared-utils] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] Remove Cloneable [maven-shared-utils] via GitHub
• Re: [I] [MSHARED-1261] CommandLine Cloneable or not [maven-shared-utils] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] [MSHARED-1176] Test case for NoSuchFileException while copying symbolic [maven-shared-utils] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] Corrected documentation for StringUtils.abbreviate() [maven-shared-utils] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Corrected documentation for StringUtils.abbreviate() [maven-shared-utils] via GitHub
• [PR] Eclipse Sisu 1.0.0-SNAPSHOT [maven] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Eclipse Sisu 1.0.0-SNAPSHOT [maven] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Eclipse Sisu 1.0.0-SNAPSHOT [maven] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Eclipse Sisu 1.0.0-SNAPSHOT [maven] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Eclipse Sisu 1.0.0-SNAPSHOT [maven] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Eclipse Sisu 1.0.0-SNAPSHOT [maven] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Eclipse Sisu 1.0.0-SNAPSHOT [maven] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Eclipse Sisu 1.0.0-SNAPSHOT [maven] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Eclipse Sisu 1.0.0-SNAPSHOT [maven] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Eclipse Sisu 1.0.0-SNAPSHOT [maven] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] Bump org.apache.jackrabbit:jackrabbit-webdav from 2.14.4 to 2.22.3 [maven-wagon] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] Bump org.junit:junit-bom from 5.14.1 to 5.14.2 [maven-jar-plugin] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Bump org.junit:junit-bom from 5.14.1 to 5.14.2 [maven-jar-plugin] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Bump org.junit:junit-bom from 5.14.1 to 5.14.2 [maven-jar-plugin] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] Bump org.slf4j:slf4j-simple from 1.7.32 to 2.0.17 [maven-clean-plugin] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] Bump commons-codec:commons-codec from 1.20.0 to 1.21.0 [maven-artifact-plugin] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Bump commons-codec:commons-codec from 1.20.0 to 1.21.0 [maven-artifact-plugin] via GitHub
• [PR] Test matrix include [maven-surefire] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Test matrix include [maven-surefire] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Test matrix include [maven-surefire] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Test matrix include [maven-surefire] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Test matrix include [maven-surefire] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Test matrix include [maven-surefire] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Test matrix include [maven-surefire] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Test matrix include [maven-surefire] via GitHub
• Re: [I] Support Maven version range activation for profiles [maven] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Support Maven version range activation for profiles [maven] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Support Maven version range activation for profiles [maven] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Support Maven version range activation for profiles [maven] via GitHub
• Re: [I] Deprecated classes/methods: Add information what to use instead [maven] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Deprecated classes/methods: Add information what to use instead [maven] via GitHub
• [PR] Bump org.junit:junit-bom from 5.14.0 to 5.14.2 [maven-plugin-tools] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Bump org.junit:junit-bom from 5.14.0 to 5.14.2 [maven-plugin-tools] via GitHub
• [I] dependency plugin 3.9.0 now fails to respect/follow relocated module artifacts [maven-dependency-plugin] via GitHub
• Re: [I] Maven 4 rejects POM when xmlns:xsi uses HTTPS [maven] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Maven 4 rejects POM when xmlns:xsi uses HTTPS [maven] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Maven 4 rejects POM when xmlns:xsi uses HTTPS [maven] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Maven 4 rejects POM when xmlns:xsi uses HTTPS [maven] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Maven 4 rejects POM when xmlns:xsi uses HTTPS [maven] via GitHub
• Re: [I] @apiNote still gives errors and doesn't work [maven-javadoc-plugin] via GitHub
• Re: [I] Add Test Start Timestamp to Surefire XML Reports [maven-surefire] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Add Test Start Timestamp to Surefire XML Reports [maven-surefire] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Add Test Start Timestamp to Surefire XML Reports [maven-surefire] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Add Test Start Timestamp to Surefire XML Reports [maven-surefire] via GitHub
• [PR] Fail on legacy config in modular projects [maven] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fail on legacy config in modular projects [maven] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fail on legacy config in modular projects [maven] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fail on legacy config in modular projects [maven] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fail on legacy config in modular projects [maven] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fail on legacy config in modular projects [maven] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fail on legacy config in modular projects [maven] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fail on legacy config in modular projects [maven] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fail on legacy config in modular projects [maven] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fail on legacy config in modular projects [maven] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fail on legacy config in modular projects [maven] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fail on legacy config in modular projects [maven] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fail on legacy config in modular projects [maven] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fail on legacy config in modular projects [maven] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fail on legacy config in modular projects [maven] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fail on legacy config in modular projects [maven] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fail on legacy config in modular projects [maven] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fail on legacy config in modular projects [maven] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fail on legacy config in modular projects [maven] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fail on legacy config in modular projects [maven] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fail on legacy config in modular projects [maven] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fail on legacy config in modular projects [maven] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fail on legacy config in modular projects [maven] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fail on legacy config in modular projects [maven] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fail on legacy config in modular projects [maven] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fail on legacy config in modular projects [maven] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fail on legacy config in modular projects [maven] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fail on legacy config in modular projects [maven] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fail on legacy config in modular projects [maven] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fail on legacy config in modular projects [maven] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fail on legacy config in modular projects [maven] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fail on legacy config in modular projects [maven] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fail on legacy config in modular projects [maven] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fail on legacy config in modular projects [maven] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fail on legacy config in modular projects [maven] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fail on legacy config in modular projects [maven] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fail on legacy config in modular projects [maven] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fail on legacy config in modular projects [maven] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fail on legacy config in modular projects [maven] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fail on legacy config in modular projects [maven] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fail on legacy config in modular projects [maven] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fail on legacy config in modular projects [maven] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fail on legacy config in modular projects [maven] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fail on legacy config in modular projects [maven] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fail on legacy config in modular projects [maven] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fail on legacy config in modular projects [maven] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fail on legacy config in modular projects [maven] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fail on legacy config in modular projects [maven] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fail on legacy config in modular projects [maven] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fail on legacy config in modular projects [maven] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fail on legacy config in modular projects [maven] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fail on legacy config in modular projects [maven] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fail on legacy config in modular projects [maven] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fail on legacy config in modular projects [maven] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fail on legacy config in modular projects [maven] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fail on legacy config in modular projects [maven] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fail on legacy config in modular projects [maven] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fail on legacy config in modular projects [maven] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fail on legacy config in modular projects [maven] via GitHub
• [PR] Bump org.redisson:redisson from 4.1.0 to 4.2.0 [maven-resolver] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Bump org.redisson:redisson from 4.1.0 to 4.2.0 [maven-resolver] via GitHub
  • [PR] Bump org.redisson:redisson from 4.1.0 to 4.2.0 [maven-resolver] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Bump org.redisson:redisson from 4.1.0 to 4.2.0 [maven-resolver] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] Replace runing external process and parsing output with simple ProcessHandle if available (Java9+) [maven-surefire] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Replace runing external process and parsing output with simple ProcessHandle if available (Java9+) [maven-surefire] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Replace runing external process and parsing output with simple ProcessHandle if available (Java9+) [maven-surefire] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Replace runing external process and parsing output with simple ProcessHandle if available (Java9+) [maven-surefire] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Replace runing external process and parsing output with simple ProcessHandle if available (Java9+) [maven-surefire] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Replace runing external process and parsing output with simple ProcessHandle if available (Java9+) [maven-surefire] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Replace runing external process and parsing output with simple ProcessHandle if available (Java9+) [maven-surefire] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Replace runing external process and parsing output with simple ProcessHandle if available (Java9+) [maven-surefire] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Replace runing external process and parsing output with simple ProcessHandle if available (Java9+) [maven-surefire] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Replace runing external process and parsing output with simple ProcessHandle if available (Java9+) [maven-surefire] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Replace runing external process and parsing output with simple ProcessHandle if available (Java9+) [maven-surefire] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Replace runing external process and parsing output with simple ProcessHandle if available (Java9+) [maven-surefire] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Replace runing external process and parsing output with simple ProcessHandle if available (Java9+) [maven-surefire] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Replace runing external process and parsing output with simple ProcessHandle if available (Java9+) [maven-surefire] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Replace runing external process and parsing output with simple ProcessHandle if available (Java9+) [maven-surefire] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Replace runing external process and parsing output with simple ProcessHandle if available (Java9+) [maven-surefire] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Replace runing external process and parsing output with simple ProcessHandle if available (Java9+) [maven-surefire] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Replace runing external process and parsing output with simple ProcessHandle if available (Java9+) [maven-surefire] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Replace runing external process and parsing output with simple ProcessHandle if available (Java9+) [maven-surefire] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Replace runing external process and parsing output with simple ProcessHandle if available (Java9+) [maven-surefire] via GitHub

• Earlier messages
• Later messages