[ http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNG-4045?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]
Brett Porter closed MNG-4045. ----------------------------- Assignee: Brett Porter Resolution: Cannot Reproduce this wasn't a direct cut and paste (there is a missing <plugins> element), so there's a chance it was mistyped in your original POM. If it is correct, I would put this down to a different version of the changes plugin behaving differently based on the existence of src/changes/changes.xml. The report is not generated if that file is missing in 2.1. Maybe it is in a different version that you get with the version removed. Either way, this isn't a Maven issue AFAICT. > Matching plugin versions also removes custom configurations > ----------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: MNG-4045 > URL: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNG-4045 > Project: Maven 2 > Issue Type: Bug > Components: Plugins and Lifecycle > Affects Versions: 2.0.9, 2.0.10 > Reporter: Paul Benedict > Assignee: Brett Porter > Attachments: MNG-4045.zip > > > I was locking down my Maven Changes Plugin version with the following config: > {code} > <reporting> > <plugin> > <groupId>org.apache.maven.plugins</groupId> > <artifactId>maven-changes-plugin</artifactId> > <version>2.1</version> > <reportSets> > <reportSet> > <reports> > <report>changes-report</report> > </reports> > </reportSet> > </reportSets> > </plugin> > </reporting> > {code} > And then I created the site and noticed the report was empty. The report > markup was there, of course, but it generated like my changes.xml was blank. > I could run changes:changes-report just fine. However, when I then removed > the <version> tag and tried site:site again, the report output was present as > expected. > Here's an interesting line from the debug output when <version> is specified: > {quote}[DEBUG] The following artifacts were filtered out for plugin: > org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-changes-plugin:2.1 because they're already in > the core of Maven:{quote} > My theory is that because my plugin version has an exact match on the > version, my specified plugin configuration is tossed. That certainly seems > like a bug to me. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/Administrators.jspa - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira