[Regression] Configuration of m-javadoc-p at reportSet level is not taken into 
account
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

                 Key: MNG-4852
                 URL: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNG-4852
             Project: Maven 2 & 3
          Issue Type: Bug
    Affects Versions: 3.0
         Environment: Apache Maven 3.0 (r1004208; 2010-10-04 13:50:56+0200)
Java version: 1.6.0_21
            Reporter: Julien HENRY


In the JWebUnit project I am using Javadoc aggregation and I put configuration 
at the <reportSet> level. But after upgrading to Maven 3 the configuration is 
not taken into account. Moving the configuration to the top level/common 
section works but may not be acceptable for all project especially when a 
different configuration for each reportSet is needed.

{code:xml}
<reporting>
    <plugins>
        <plugin>
            <groupId>org.apache.maven.plugins</groupId>
            <artifactId>maven-javadoc-plugin</artifactId>
            <version>2.7</version>
            <configuration>
                <!-- What is put here is taken into account -->
            </configuration>
            <reportSets>
                <reportSet>
                    <id>aggregate</id>
                    <configuration>
                        <!-- What is put here is NOT taken into account -->
                    </configuration>
                    <reports>
                        <report>aggregate</report>
                    </reports>
                </reportSet>
            </reportSets>
        </plugin>
    </plugins>
</reporting>
{code}

- with Maven 2 I am using m-site-p 2.1.1
- with Maven 3 I am using m-site-p 3.0-beta-2

I don't know if this is a M3 or a m-site-p regression.


-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: 
http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

        

Reply via email to