[ 
https://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MASSEMBLY-597?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=355291#comment-355291
 ] 

Kristian Rosenvold edited comment on MASSEMBLY-597 at 11/3/14 1:36 AM:
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

Using the enclosed project it looks correct to me. I tried both maven 2.2.1 and 
3.x and the output looks entirely correct. This was on mac/jdk8. I even tried a 
fair number of different versions of the assembly plugin, and they all look 
correct. Exactly what are you seeing ?

Actually, you might want to try assembly version 2.5 (or 2.5.1), since there 
was a windows-related path bug that was fixed for 2.5

Addendum: This walks like PLXCOMP-254, talks like PLXCOMP-254 and probably is 
PLXCOMP-254


was (Author: krosenvold):
Using the enclosed project it looks correct to me. I tried both maven 2.2.1 and 
3.x and the output looks entirely correct. This was on mac/jdk8. I even tried a 
fair number of different versions of the assembly plugin, and they all look 
correct. Exactly what are you seeing ?

Actually, you might want to try assembly version 2.5 (or 2.5.1), since there 
was a windows-related path bug that was fixed for 2.5

> Duplicate files added to archive when present in both dependencyset and 
> fileset of the same assembly
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: MASSEMBLY-597
>                 URL: https://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MASSEMBLY-597
>             Project: Maven Assembly Plugin
>          Issue Type: Bug
>    Affects Versions: 2.2.2
>         Environment: windows 7, Eclipse indigo though the problem is 
> reproducible from command line build. Java 6 32 bit
>            Reporter: Eric Daigneault
>         Attachments: ma597.zip
>
>
> Comment added to parent bug, could not re-open the issue so I created this 
> sub-task instead.  Comment copied here for convenience :
> ----
> Either version 2.2.2 of the Assembly plugin has a regression or the issue has 
> not been fixed.  I am currently creating zip files from the assembly that 
> contains duplicate jar files.  
> Some background :  I am using the assembly to create a zip file of an 
> application.  Why Zip ? because the application requires multiple 
> configuration files and spans larger than just Java so I cannot use a uber 
> Jar (I would prefer that but technical limitations out of my control force me 
> otherwise).
> This package is built correctly.
> To make life simpler I made it possible to extend this package with a project 
> that can add extra classes (plugins and such) and configuration from a 
> standard layout in the project that gets picked up by the assembly and merged 
> with the previous vanilla package.  the end result is a fully assembled zip 
> file with all the customized parts in the right place.
> Now, behaviour changed across version wheras previously I would overwrite the 
> original package with the content of the new one, now I have to start from 
> the overrides and complete withe the original files.  Easily fixed through 
> changing the order I declared the filesets in the assembly.  When using 
> filesets strictly nothing gets added twice, though the replace was changed to 
> skip which is a bit counter intuitive.
> BUT....
> Since I extend some parts of the original system, I will share some 
> dependencies with this one.  These dependencies are already present in the 
> original package and get added through a file set (I get the package and 
> unzip it in a temporary folder where I integrate it`s content inthe assembly 
> through a fileset).  
> I also add the dependencies of the new customized project, and these get 
> added twice.
> I think there is a regression here when filesets and dependencysets interact 
> where if files are present in both they get added twice in the zip file.  Now 
> I would re-open this current task but it seems I cannot so I will open a sub 
> task instead.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.1.6#6162)

Reply via email to