[ https://jira.codehaus.org/browse/SUREFIRE-833?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=356108#comment-356108 ]
Tibor Digana commented on SUREFIRE-833: --------------------------------------- right Andreas. In that case we need to write a concept for 3.0. It should be done in a convenient way, e.g. mailing list. > Support for annotated JUnit @Category > ------------------------------------- > > Key: SUREFIRE-833 > URL: https://jira.codehaus.org/browse/SUREFIRE-833 > Project: Maven Surefire > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: Junit 4.x support > Affects Versions: 2.12 > Reporter: Jan Goyvaerts > Attachments: SUREFIRE-833-spraguep-2.patch, > SUREFIRE-833-spraguep.patch > > > The current implementation of Surefire seems to look for explicit @Category > annotations in the test classes. And will only consider those. Suppose I'd > like to add a more concise annotation for this: > @Category(IntegrationTests.class) <== JUnit @Category > @Target({ElementType.TYPE}) > @Retention(RetentionPolicy.RUNTIME) > @Documented > public @interface IntegrationTest {} > Annotating my test class with @IntegrationTest does not work. Although I > think it looks much better than repeating everywhere in my code > "@Category(com.foo.bar.IntegrationTests.class)". For which I add an > additional dependency in the interface class btw. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.1.6#6162)