[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-3961?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15014400#comment-15014400
 ] 

Jie Yu commented on MESOS-3961:
-------------------------------

Yeah, I agree that's an unfortunate situation. Also, I've got questions like 
why the user has to specify a 'volume' when creating a persistent disk resource 
(but not yet launching a task). I think we need to re-think those problems. 
Thanks for filing the ticket.

>From the implementation perspective, we did that because the master will 
>perform 'contains' check to make sure a task is not using resources that are 
>not offered to it. If we don't ignore 'volume', that means the framework 
>cannot change 'container_path' once the volume is created. That's a bit 
>unfortunate as well.

> Consider equality behavior for DiskInfo resource
> ------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: MESOS-3961
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-3961
>             Project: Mesos
>          Issue Type: Bug
>            Reporter: Neil Conway
>            Priority: Minor
>              Labels: mesosphere, persistent-volumes
>
> Relevant code:
> {code}
> bool operator==(const Resource::DiskInfo& left, const Resource::DiskInfo& 
> right)
> {
>   // NOTE: We ignore 'volume' inside DiskInfo when doing comparison
>   // because it describes how this resource will be used which has
>   // nothing to do with the Resource object itself. A framework can
>   // use this resource and specify different 'volume' every time it
>   // uses it.
>   if (left.has_persistence() != right.has_persistence()) {
>     return false;
>   }
>   if (left.has_persistence()) {
>     return left.persistence().id() == right.persistence().id();
>   }
>   return true;
> }
> {code}
> A consequence of this behavior is that if you pass the wrong path to a 
> `destroy-volume` request (but there is a persistent volume that otherwise 
> matches the request), the path will be ignored and the volume will be 
> destroyed. Not clear if that is undesirable, but it does seem surprising.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to