[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-8534?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16366503#comment-16366503
 ] 

ASF GitHub Bot commented on MESOS-8534:
---------------------------------------

Github user jieyu commented on a diff in the pull request:

    https://github.com/apache/mesos/pull/263#discussion_r168652041
  
    --- Diff: src/slave/containerizer/mesos/isolators/network/cni/cni.cpp ---
    @@ -721,7 +721,7 @@ Future<Option<ContainerLaunchInfo>> 
NetworkCniIsolatorProcess::prepare(
         env->set_name("LIBPROCESS_IP");
         env->set_value("0.0.0.0");
     
    -    if (!containerId.has_parent()) {
    +    if (needsSeparateNs) {
    --- End diff --
    
    This should be
    ```
    if (!isDebugContainer && (!nestedContainer || !joinParentNetwork))
    ```


> Allow nested containers in TaskGroups to have separate network namespaces
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: MESOS-8534
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-8534
>             Project: Mesos
>          Issue Type: Task
>          Components: containerization
>            Reporter: Sagar Sadashiv Patwardhan
>            Priority: Minor
>              Labels: cni
>
> As per the discussion with [~jieyu] and [~avinash.mesos] , I am going to 
> allow nested containers in TaskGroups to have separate namespaces. I am also 
> going to retain the existing functionality, where nested containers can share 
> namespaces with parent/root container.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

Reply via email to