adamdebreceni commented on a change in pull request #1057:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nifi-minifi-cpp/pull/1057#discussion_r635265649
##########
File path: libminifi/include/utils/Enum.h
##########
@@ -60,6 +63,22 @@ namespace utils {
#define FOR_EACH_8(fn, delim, _1, _2, _3, _4, _5, _6, _7, _8) \
fn(_1) delim() fn(_2) delim() fn(_3) delim() fn(_4) delim() \
fn(_5) delim() fn(_6) delim() fn(_7) delim() fn(_8)
+#define FOR_EACH_9(fn, delim, _1, _2, _3, _4, _5, _6, _7, _8, _9) \
+ fn(_1) delim() fn(_2) delim() fn(_3) delim() fn(_4) delim() \
+ fn(_5) delim() fn(_6) delim() fn(_7) delim() fn(_8) delim() \
+ fn(_9)
+#define FOR_EACH_10(fn, delim, _1, _2, _3, _4, _5, _6, _7, _8, _9, _10) \
+ fn(_1) delim() fn(_2) delim() fn(_3) delim() fn(_4) delim() \
+ fn(_5) delim() fn(_6) delim() fn(_7) delim() fn(_8) delim() \
+ fn(_9) delim() fn(_10)
+#define FOR_EACH_11(fn, delim, _1, _2, _3, _4, _5, _6, _7, _8, _9, _10, _11) \
+ fn(_1) delim() fn(_2) delim() fn(_3) delim() fn(_4) delim() \
+ fn(_5) delim() fn(_6) delim() fn(_7) delim() fn(_8) delim() \
+ fn(_9) delim() fn(_10) delim() fn(_11)
+#define FOR_EACH_12(fn, delim, _1, _2, _3, _4, _5, _6, _7, _8, _9, _10, _11,
_12) \
+ fn(_1) delim() fn(_2) delim() fn(_3) delim() fn(_4) delim() \
+ fn(_5) delim() fn(_6) delim() fn(_7) delim() fn(_8) delim() \
+ fn(_9) delim() fn(_10) delim() fn(_11) delim() fn(_12)
Review comment:
I cannot recall what was the reasoning behind the current
non-"recursive" macros, changed them
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org
