pvillard31 commented on a change in pull request #3610: NIFI-6552 Kudu Put 
Operations
URL: https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/3610#discussion_r318976836
 
 

 ##########
 File path: 
nifi-nar-bundles/nifi-kudu-bundle/nifi-kudu-processors/src/main/java/org/apache/nifi/processors/kudu/AbstractKuduProcessor.java
 ##########
 @@ -0,0 +1,262 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one or more
+ * contributor license agreements.  See the NOTICE file distributed with
+ * this work for additional information regarding copyright ownership.
+ * The ASF licenses this file to You under the Apache License, Version 2.0
+ * (the "License"); you may not use this file except in compliance with
+ * the License.  You may obtain a copy of the License at
+ *
+ *     http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
+ *
+ * Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software
+ * distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS,
+ * WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied.
+ * See the License for the specific language governing permissions and
+ * limitations under the License.
+ */
+
+package org.apache.nifi.processors.kudu;
+
+import org.apache.kudu.shaded.com.google.common.annotations.VisibleForTesting;
+import org.apache.kudu.ColumnSchema;
+import org.apache.kudu.Schema;
+import org.apache.kudu.Type;
+import org.apache.kudu.client.AsyncKuduClient;
+import org.apache.kudu.client.KuduClient;
+import org.apache.kudu.client.KuduTable;
+import org.apache.kudu.client.KuduSession;
+import org.apache.kudu.client.KuduException;
+import org.apache.kudu.client.OperationResponse;
+import org.apache.kudu.client.PartialRow;
+import org.apache.kudu.client.RowError;
+import org.apache.kudu.client.SessionConfiguration;
+import org.apache.kudu.client.Delete;
+import org.apache.kudu.client.Insert;
+import org.apache.kudu.client.Upsert;
+import org.apache.kudu.client.Update;
+import org.apache.nifi.annotation.lifecycle.OnStopped;
+import org.apache.nifi.components.PropertyDescriptor;
+import org.apache.nifi.components.PropertyDescriptor.Builder;
+import org.apache.nifi.expression.ExpressionLanguageScope;
+import org.apache.nifi.kerberos.KerberosCredentialsService;
+import org.apache.nifi.processor.AbstractProcessor;
+import org.apache.nifi.processor.ProcessContext;
+import org.apache.nifi.processor.util.StandardValidators;
+import org.apache.nifi.security.krb.KerberosAction;
+import org.apache.nifi.security.krb.KerberosKeytabUser;
+import org.apache.nifi.security.krb.KerberosUser;
+import org.apache.nifi.serialization.record.Record;
+
+import javax.security.auth.login.LoginException;
+import java.math.BigDecimal;
+import java.util.Arrays;
+import java.util.List;
+
+public abstract class AbstractKuduProcessor extends AbstractProcessor {
+
+    static final PropertyDescriptor KUDU_MASTERS = new Builder()
+            .name("Kudu Masters")
+            .description("Comma separated addresses of the Kudu masters to 
connect to.")
+            .required(true)
+            .addValidator(StandardValidators.NON_EMPTY_VALIDATOR)
+            
.expressionLanguageSupported(ExpressionLanguageScope.VARIABLE_REGISTRY)
+            .build();
+
+    static final PropertyDescriptor KERBEROS_CREDENTIALS_SERVICE = new 
Builder()
+            .name("kerberos-credentials-service")
+            .displayName("Kerberos Credentials Service")
+            .description("Specifies the Kerberos Credentials to use for 
authentication")
+            .required(false)
+            .identifiesControllerService(KerberosCredentialsService.class)
+            .build();
+
+    static final PropertyDescriptor KUDU_OPERATION_TIMEOUT_MS = new Builder()
 
 Review comment:
   I realize we could use
   
   ````
   .addValidator(StandardValidators.TIME_PERIOD_VALIDATOR)
   .defaultValue(String.valueOf(AsyncKuduClient.DEFAULT_OPERATION_TIMEOUT_MS) + 
"ms")
   ````
   
   So that we can remove the "in milliseconds" for the property name. It gives 
the user more flexibility. Then, when evaluating the value, you can use:
   
   ````
   
context.getProperty(KUDU_OPERATION_TIMEOUT_MS).asTimePeriod(TimeUnit.MILLISECONDS).intValue()
   ````
   
   This way I think it's more flexible for the user. What do you think?

----------------------------------------------------------------
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
 
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org


With regards,
Apache Git Services

Reply via email to