errose28 commented on PR #4052: URL: https://github.com/apache/ozone/pull/4052#issuecomment-1347248133
Thanks for the info @Xushaohong, your explanation makes sense. The Ratis log would probably be longer than the RocksDB WAL, so we can assume if we need a snapshot because there are no Ratis logs, those entries would have been flushed from the RocksDB WAL as well. Hence Recon's mechanism for incremental updates is not useful in this case. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
