emkornfield commented on code in PR #588: URL: https://github.com/apache/parquet-format/pull/588#discussion_r3456064007
########## ParxMagicNumber.md: ########## @@ -0,0 +1,89 @@ +# PARX Parquet Format Specification Review Comment: The conversation that spurred this thread and a bunch of the discussion involved reader/writer coordination. In particular the original [doc](https://docs.google.com/document/d/1zrbGT4kRCEdadBUludwfQR9b2CfLgH-RWn9zE84gYfg/edit?tab=t.0#heading=h.wzd4ej8rcgt6) posed these questions: > Is a deliberately curated capability level — "V3" — the right vehicle for setting shared reader/writer expectations, building on issue #384? > How far can and should we go in aligning the magic number, footer version, and release version? The PARX format is one means of solving this coordination, which I think satisfies requirements from the community, so I'm not sure it makes sense to decouple it completely? -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
