[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-4519?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16636310#comment-16636310
]
Vincent Poon commented on PHOENIX-4519:
---------------------------------------
Looking at the code with [~tdsilva] , I'm now actually not sure why this would
be needed. My understanding of what's happening here:
You run "alter index rebuild async" , which sets ASYNC_REBUILD_TIMESTAMP. You
then run the IndexTool with isPartial=true , which then does a partial rebuild
from INDEX_DISABLE_TIMESTAMP to ASYNC_REBUILD_TIMESTAMP. Btw [~gjacoby], to
make this patch complete, I think when ASYNC_REBUILD_TIMESTAMP is set, you will
need to pass isPartial=true to the IndexTool. A while back I filed
PHOENIX-4703 to do what I think you were looking for with this JIRA.
However, if the index_disable_timestamp is set by an index write failure, then
the rebuilder thread should do the same anyways. So I think running the
IndexTool with partial=true would only help if someone set the
index_disable_timestamp manually first. Is that true, [~an...@apache.org] ?
> Index rebuild MR jobs not created for "alter index rebuild async" rebuilds
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: PHOENIX-4519
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-4519
> Project: Phoenix
> Issue Type: Bug
> Reporter: Vincent Poon
> Assignee: Geoffrey Jacoby
> Priority: Major
> Fix For: 4.15.0, 5.1.0
>
> Attachments: PHOENIX-4519-v2.patch, PHOENIX-4519-v3.patch,
> PHOENIX-4519.patch
>
>
> It seems we have two ASYNC flags for index rebuilds:
> ASYNC_CREATED_DATE - when an index is created async
> ASYNC_REBUILD_TIMESTAMP - created by "alter index ... rebuild async"
> The PhoenixMRJobSubmitter only submits MR jobs for the former. We should
> also submit jobs for the latter.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)
