[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-5295?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16848050#comment-16848050
 ] 

Hadoop QA commented on PHOENIX-5295:
------------------------------------

{color:red}-1 overall{color}.  Here are the results of testing the latest 
attachment 
  
http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12969728/PHOENIX-5295.4.14-cdh5.11.v2.patch
  against 4.14-cdh5.11 branch at commit 
0d0efd467871582ce298d15891cce5adf50c92e4.
  ATTACHMENT ID: 12969728

    {color:green}+1 @author{color}.  The patch does not contain any @author 
tags.

    {color:green}+1 tests included{color}.  The patch appears to include 3 new 
or modified tests.

    {color:green}+1 javac{color}.  The applied patch does not increase the 
total number of javac compiler warnings.

    {color:red}-1 release audit{color}.  The applied patch generated 425 
release audit warnings (more than the master's current 0 warnings).

    {color:green}+1 lineLengths{color}.  The patch does not introduce lines 
longer than 100

    {color:green}+1 core tests{color}.  The patch passed unit tests in .

Test results: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-PHOENIX-Build/2603//testReport/
Release audit warnings: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-PHOENIX-Build/2603//artifact/patchprocess/patchReleaseAuditWarnings.txt
Console output: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-PHOENIX-Build/2603//console

This message is automatically generated.

> Local Index data not replicating for older HBase versions (<= HBase 1.2)
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: PHOENIX-5295
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-5295
>             Project: Phoenix
>          Issue Type: Bug
>         Environment: Branch 4.14-cdh5.11
>            Reporter: Hieu Nguyen
>            Priority: Major
>         Attachments: PHOENIX-5295.4.14-cdh5.11.v1.patch, 
> PHOENIX-5295.4.14-cdh5.11.v1.patch, PHOENIX-5295.4.14-cdh5.11.v2.patch
>
>          Time Spent: 40m
>  Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> Copied from email thread 
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/7ab1d9489eca2ab2b974948fbe60b143fda432ef7dfc603528d460f2@%3Cuser.phoenix.apache.org%3E.
> ---
> We are on Phoenix 4.14-cdh5.11.  We are experiencing an issue where local 
> index data is not being replicated through HBase replication.  As suggested 
> in a previous email thread 
> (https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/984fba3c8abd944846deefb3ea285195e0436b9181b9779feac39b59@%3Cuser.phoenix.apache.org%3E),
>  we have enabled replication for the local indexes (the "L#0" column family 
> on the same table).  We wrote an integration test to demonstrate this issue 
> on top of 4.14-cdh5.11 branch 
> (https://github.com/hnguyen08/phoenix/commit/3589cb45d941c6909fb3deb5f5abb0f8dfa78dd7).
> After some investigation and debugging, we discovered the following:
> 1. Commit a2f4d7eebec621b58204a9eb78d552f18dcbcf24 (PHOENIX-3827) fixed the 
> issue, but only in Phoenix for HBase1.3+.  It uses the 
> miniBatchOp.addOperationsFromCP() API introduced in HBase1.3.  Unfortunately, 
> for the time being, we are stuck on cdh5.11 (based on HBase1.2).
> 2. IndexUtil.writeLocalUpdates() is called in both implementations of 
> IndexCommitter, both taking skipWAL=true.  It seems like we'd actually want 
> to not skip WAL to ensure that local-index updates are replicated correctly 
> (since, as mentioned in the above email thread, "HBase-level replication of 
> the data table will not trigger index updates").  After changing the skipWAL 
> flag to false, the above integration test passes.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

Reply via email to