virajjasani commented on a change in pull request #951:
URL: https://github.com/apache/phoenix/pull/951#discussion_r515785773



##########
File path: 
phoenix-core/src/it/java/org/apache/phoenix/replication/SystemCatalogWALEntryFilterIT.java
##########
@@ -134,11 +135,16 @@ public void testSystemCatalogWALEntryFilter() throws 
Exception {
 
     //verify that the tenant view WAL.Entry passes the filter and the 
non-tenant view does not
     SystemCatalogWALEntryFilter filter = new SystemCatalogWALEntryFilter();
-    Assert.assertNull(filter.filter(nonTenantEntry));
-    WAL.Entry filteredTenantEntry = filter.filter(tenantEntry);
+    // Chain the system catalog WAL entry filter to ChainWALEntryFilter
+    ChainWALEntryFilter chainWALEntryFilter = new ChainWALEntryFilter(filter);
+    // Asserting the WALEdit for non tenant has cells before getting filtered
+    Assert.assertTrue(nonTenantEntry.getEdit().size() > 0);
+    // All the cells will get removed by the filter since they do not belong 
to tenant
+    Assert.assertTrue("Non tenant edits for system catalog got ", 
chainWALEntryFilter.filter(nonTenantEntry).getEdit().isEmpty());
+    WAL.Entry filteredTenantEntry = chainWALEntryFilter.filter(tenantEntry);
     Assert.assertNotNull("Tenant view was filtered when it shouldn't be!", 
filteredTenantEntry);
     Assert.assertEquals(tenantEntry.getEdit().size(),
-        filter.filter(tenantEntry).getEdit().size());
+        chainWALEntryFilter.filter(tenantEntry).getEdit().size());

Review comment:
       nit: this could be `filteredTenantEntry.getEdit().size())` ?

##########
File path: 
phoenix-core/src/main/java/org/apache/phoenix/replication/SystemCatalogWALEntryFilter.java
##########
@@ -35,30 +36,30 @@
  * be copied. This WALEntryFilter will only allow tenant-owned rows in 
SYSTEM.CATALOG to
  * be replicated. Data from all other tables is automatically passed.
  */
-public class SystemCatalogWALEntryFilter implements WALEntryFilter {
+public class SystemCatalogWALEntryFilter implements WALEntryFilter, 
WALCellFilter {
+  // This is an optimization to just skip the cell filter if we do not care 
about
+  // cell filter for certain WALEdits.
+  private boolean skipCellFilter;
 
   @Override
   public WAL.Entry filter(WAL.Entry entry) {
-
+    // We use the WALCellFilter to filter the cells from entry, WALEntryFilter
+    // should not block anything
     //if the WAL.Entry's table isn't System.Catalog or System.Child_Link, it 
auto-passes this filter
-    //TODO: when Phoenix drops support for pre-1.3 versions of HBase, redo as 
a WALCellFilter
     if (!SchemaUtil.isMetaTable(entry.getKey().getTableName().getName())){
-      return entry;
+      skipCellFilter = true;
+    } else {
+      skipCellFilter = false;
     }
+    return entry;
+  }
 
-    List<Cell> cells = entry.getEdit().getCells();
-    List<Cell> cellsToRemove = Lists.newArrayList();
-    for (Cell cell : cells) {
-      if (!isTenantRowCell(cell)){
-        cellsToRemove.add(cell);
-      }
-    }
-    cells.removeAll(cellsToRemove);
-    if (cells.size() > 0) {
-      return entry;
-    } else {
-      return null;
+  @Override
+  public Cell filterCell(WAL.Entry entry, Cell cell) {
+    if (skipCellFilter) {
+      return cell;
     }
+    return isTenantRowCell(cell) ? cell : null;
   }
 
   private boolean isTenantRowCell(Cell cell) {

Review comment:
       Not related to this changes, but wondering if we need to construct 
ImmutableBytesWritable object.
   Can this method impl be reduced to:
   ```
       return cell.getRowArray()[cell.getRowOffset()] != 
QueryConstants.SEPARATOR_BYTE;
   ```
   

##########
File path: 
phoenix-core/src/main/java/org/apache/phoenix/replication/SystemCatalogWALEntryFilter.java
##########
@@ -21,6 +21,7 @@
 
 import org.apache.hadoop.hbase.Cell;
 import org.apache.hadoop.hbase.io.ImmutableBytesWritable;
+import org.apache.hadoop.hbase.replication.WALCellFilter;
 import org.apache.hadoop.hbase.replication.WALEntryFilter;
 import org.apache.hadoop.hbase.wal.WAL;
 import org.apache.phoenix.query.QueryConstants;

Review comment:
       nit: we can get rid of `List` and `Lists` imports




----------------------------------------------------------------
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org


Reply via email to