virajjasani commented on a change in pull request #1114:
URL: https://github.com/apache/phoenix/pull/1114#discussion_r565092144



##########
File path: 
phoenix-core/src/main/java/org/apache/phoenix/iterate/RoundRobinResultIterator.java
##########
@@ -114,6 +114,7 @@ public Tuple next() throws SQLException {
                 index = (index + 1) % size;
             }
         }
+        close();

Review comment:
       When RRIterator#peek() (next result) is null, we close the iterator. But 
if we don't get any next result after looping through all RRIterators, we 
should close() here, that's the plan right? 
   Although this looks good, curious if caller can implement the logic of 
calling RRResultIterator#close() if RRResultIterator#next() returns null. But 
if caller logic turns out to be more complicated, sure we should go this route 
I believe.




----------------------------------------------------------------
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org


Reply via email to