[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PLC4X-286?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17304835#comment-17304835
]
Adrian Lazar commented on PLC4X-286:
------------------------------------
Hey, thanks for the fast reply.
The goal of the profinet-DCP would be to scan a network for all the compatible
devices, therefore there should be no IP passed, but a network interface to use
( e.g. {{connectionString="profinet-dcp://eth0?sender=50:65:f3:b8:cd:a3"}}) ->
'sender' value could even be figured out by the driver since it is the
mac-address of the network interface.
In order to achieve this, should I implement the solution to the
{{plc4j-transport-raw-socket}} project?
> Add profinet-DCP
> ----------------
>
> Key: PLC4X-286
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PLC4X-286
> Project: Apache PLC4X
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: Driver-Ethernet/IP, Driver-Profinet, Driver-S7
> Affects Versions: 0.9.0
> Reporter: Adrian Lazar
> Priority: Major
> Labels: beginner, feature, question
>
> I found some work done towards implementing the
> [profinet-DCP|https://profinetuniversity.com/naming-addressing/profinet-dcp/]
> protocol on the [feature/profinet
> branch|[https://github.com/apache/plc4x/tree/feature/profinet]].
> I see that the profinet protocol is not on the develop branch anymore, was it
> replaced with the s7 protocol?
> If someone would have the time to guide me, I could work on it to update,
> test, and bring this discovery feature to PLC4X.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)
