szetszwo commented on pull request #616: URL: https://github.com/apache/ratis/pull/616#issuecomment-1061477782
@SincereXIA , if we want to support unsafe-flush (i.e. increase flush index without waiting flush to complete), we don't need to use FlushWorker anymore since it is for safe-flush. We should answer the following two questions: - Why async flush is slower then the single-thread flush? - Why async flush with current flushIntervalMin causing a bug? Could you test https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/13040828/616_unsafeFlush.patch ? -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected]
