[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ROCKETMQ-106?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15885223#comment-15885223
 ] 

ASF GitHub Bot commented on ROCKETMQ-106:
-----------------------------------------

Github user coveralls commented on the issue:

    https://github.com/apache/incubator-rocketmq/pull/66
  
    
    [![Coverage 
Status](https://coveralls.io/builds/10340511/badge)](https://coveralls.io/builds/10340511)
    
    Coverage increased (+0.5%) to 32.021% when pulling 
**70de21da93b01f81680c1b8c420cc0dc111cf319 on 
Jaskey:ROCKETMQ-106-topic-flow-control** into 
**573b22c37806a21543b90707bcce6022243a62da on apache:master**.



> Add flow control on topic level
> -------------------------------
>
>                 Key: ROCKETMQ-106
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ROCKETMQ-106
>             Project: Apache RocketMQ
>          Issue Type: Wish
>          Components: rocketmq-client
>            Reporter: Jaskey Lam
>            Assignee: Jaskey Lam
>
> *Motivations*
> For current flow control, we can only control on queue level. 
> Howerver, the numbers of queue allocated may be dynamic changed. For example, 
> I might hope to control that at most 1000 messages can be pulled from broker 
> to protect my client. And I have no idea how many queue I am allocated. Maybe 
> I will have 5 queue and 5 instances so I set `pullThresholdForQueue`=1000, 
> which works as expected when one is fine. But as long as any instances 
> crashes, some instances may be allocated  more than one queue, which will 
> make messages pulled from broker exceed my expectations.
> A configuration of  `pullThresholdForTopic` is propably most user hopes.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)

Reply via email to