[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-15265?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17303959#comment-17303959 ]
Dawid Weiss commented on SOLR-15265: ------------------------------------ Hi Chris. I added a PR showing how to fetch Lucene javadocs as maven artifacts and unpack them locally. This should be enough to validate links, I think (but I didn't take it any further). bq. When you mention the cross-linking problem, are you concerned about the more general link checking logic that the "documentation" task uses to make sure we don't have broken links in the solr/lucene javadocs? ... I'm not really familiar at all with how that works (is it recursive?) I'm not really that familiar with it myself. What I meant by "cross-linking" is that those Lucene javadocs we fetch from maven JARs will not be linked between themselves. For non-snapshot releases they should be ok though as then javadocs are rendered with links pointing to the final javadoc URL location. > decide if/how to validate lucene javadoc links > ---------------------------------------------- > > Key: SOLR-15265 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-15265 > Project: Solr > Issue Type: Sub-task > Security Level: Public(Default Security Level. Issues are Public) > Reporter: Chris M. Hostetter > Priority: Major > Time Spent: 10m > Remaining Estimate: 0h > > From parent issue... > {quote} > come up with a longer term plan for if/how we want to "validate" links to > lucene javadocs > * we currently don't do any validation of links to "remote" urls in the > ref-guide content – regardless of wether they are hardcoded or version > specific via ivy properties > * we may want to revisit that now ... either in general, or via some lucene > specific logic (possibly via fetching lucene src or javadoc jars) since we > have so many links to lucene class javadocs > {quote} -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v8.3.4#803005)