[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-15252?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17322464#comment-17322464
]
David Smiley commented on SOLR-15252:
-------------------------------------
I agree with 10K. More than that – use pagination. RE time based pause warning
– it's a nice touch! But why handle this in a way inconsistent with
maxBooleanClauses? I know there was a great debate behind maxBooleanClauses
but it's there and it's configurable.
> Solr should log WARN log when a query requests huge rows number
> ---------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: SOLR-15252
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-15252
> Project: Solr
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: query
> Reporter: Jan Høydahl
> Assignee: Jan Høydahl
> Priority: Major
> Time Spent: 20m
> Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> We have all seen it - clients that use Integer.MAX_VALUE or 10000000 as rows
> parameter, to just make sure they get all possible results. And this of
> course leads to high GC pauses since Lucene allocates an array up front to
> hold results.
> Solr should either log WARN when it encounters a value above a certain
> threshold, such as 100k (then you should use cursormark instead). Or it
> should simply respond with 400 error and have a system property or query
> parameter folks can use to override if they know what they are doing.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@solr.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@solr.apache.org
