[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-12697?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17355065#comment-17355065 ]
Christine Poerschke commented on SOLR-12697: -------------------------------------------- Thanks [~TomGilke] for experimenting and turning the idea into a first draft for a {{PrefetchingFieldValueFeature}} feature! Yes please, let's create a separate Jira for that and yes under SOLR-12688 umbrella could help make it more discoverable relative to this ticket here. I've also just moved SOLR-15440 under the umbrella since it's logically also a continuation of the work started in this item here. > pure DocValues support for FieldValueFeature > -------------------------------------------- > > Key: SOLR-12697 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-12697 > Project: Solr > Issue Type: Sub-task > Components: contrib - LTR > Reporter: Stanislav Livotov > Assignee: Christine Poerschke > Priority: Major > Fix For: main (9.0), 8.9 > > Attachments: SOLR-12697.patch, SOLR-12697.patch, SOLR-12697.patch, > SOLR-12697.patch, SOLR-12697.patch > > Time Spent: 8h 20m > Remaining Estimate: 0h > > [~slivotov] wrote in SOLR-12688: > bq. ... FieldValueFeature doesn't support pure DocValues fields (Stored > false). Please also note that for fields which are both stored and DocValues > it is working not optimal because it is extracting just one field from the > stored document. DocValues are obviously faster for such usecases. ... > (Please see SOLR-12688 description for overall context and analysis results.) -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v8.3.4#803005) --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@solr.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@solr.apache.org