[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-12697?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17355884#comment-17355884 ]
Tom Gilke commented on SOLR-12697: ---------------------------------- Hi [~cpoerschke], here is the link to the ticket: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-15450. I also referenced this ticket (12697) so that potential collaborators can read the thoughts that are already written down here. I still have to look into the tests for the idea, but will try to get to it during this week and create a PR. > pure DocValues support for FieldValueFeature > -------------------------------------------- > > Key: SOLR-12697 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-12697 > Project: Solr > Issue Type: Sub-task > Components: contrib - LTR > Reporter: Stanislav Livotov > Assignee: Christine Poerschke > Priority: Major > Fix For: main (9.0), 8.9 > > Attachments: SOLR-12697.patch, SOLR-12697.patch, SOLR-12697.patch, > SOLR-12697.patch, SOLR-12697.patch > > Time Spent: 8h 20m > Remaining Estimate: 0h > > [~slivotov] wrote in SOLR-12688: > bq. ... FieldValueFeature doesn't support pure DocValues fields (Stored > false). Please also note that for fields which are both stored and DocValues > it is working not optimal because it is extracting just one field from the > stored document. DocValues are obviously faster for such usecases. ... > (Please see SOLR-12688 description for overall context and analysis results.) -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v8.3.4#803005) --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@solr.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@solr.apache.org