HoustonPutman commented on pull request #120: URL: https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/120#issuecomment-858744198
> if we go the path of using the BlobRepository abstraction, the ultimate goal would be to have it be a separate unit I agree that (2) is the best option out of the 3. > That's definitely the question. I lean I think towards skipping the abstraction until we're in a situation where its value is more clear cut. If someone adds an Azure store next year and more repeated bits of code crop up, we can always add the middle-layer in at that point. But that's just my leaning - if you guys are confident that it'll be better to leave it in, I'm happy to go with that. The BlobIndexInput question might shed light on this too. I agree with Jason here as well. I might have missed something, but did you mention at some point that this `BlobRepository` abstraction code was also going to be used for the blob-replicas that we've heard so much about? Or would that use something completely separate? -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@solr.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@solr.apache.org
