[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-15064?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17494896#comment-17494896
]
ASF subversion and git services commented on SOLR-15064:
--------------------------------------------------------
Commit 27a8dc69b7f58a3875794a67f1d66865426078b3 in solr's branch
refs/heads/main from David Smiley
[ https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=solr.git;h=27a8dc6 ]
SOLR-15064: nested docs: _route_ shouldn't be a fallback for a blank _root_
(#629)
Doing atomic updates for nested documents should not use/assume that the
_route_ parameter is a substitute for _root_ if that's not present. Thus
insist the user specify the _root_ field so as to leave no doubt that the
atomic update is a child and not itself a root document.
* Rename getChildIdStr -> getSelfOrNestedDocIdStr
> Atomic/partial updates to nested docs should not assume _route_ param is the
> root ID
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: SOLR-15064
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-15064
> Project: Solr
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Reporter: David Smiley
> Assignee: David Smiley
> Priority: Blocker
> Labels: NestedDocuments
> Fix For: 9.0
>
> Time Spent: 40m
> Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> In SOLR-14923, doing an atomic/partial update to a child doc requires
> indicating what the root doc ID is. Formerly Solr tried to figure this out
> automatically, but that had costly implications. SOLR-14923 adds a
> temporary hack that assumes that the \_route_ paramter *is* the root ID, if
> the \_root_ field is not on the doc. But that's not necessarily accurate, so
> it should be removed.
>
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.1#820001)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@solr.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@solr.apache.org
