dsmiley commented on PR #1360:
URL: https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/1360#issuecomment-1454899402

   Thanks Rob for chiming in.
   
   Made two commits.
   I looked at the ComplexPhraseQParser test and I don't think we should bend 
over backwards to support `hl.usePhraseHighlighter=false`, which is what the 
failing test failed to do. Trying to support it could make performance worse or 
extra code/complexity. It's less accurate and designed to be faster in some 
circumstances with older highlighters but I'd be content if this flag simply 
didn't exist at all.  Also I noticed a commented out test that should work 
nowadays and it does (thanks to UnifiedHighlighter probably), so I enabled it.


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@solr.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@solr.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@solr.apache.org

Reply via email to