[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-2089?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14028937#comment-14028937
 ] 

Sandy Ryza commented on SPARK-2089:
-----------------------------------

I'll take this up.

It seems like our options are:
* Instead of waking up the Spark-YARN code when YarnClusterScheduler is 
initialized, wake it up in the SparkContext constructor after setting 
preferredNodeLocationData
* Move preferredNodeLocationData back into SparkContext's primary constructor
* Find some way to put preferredNodeLocationData into SparkConf

[~pwendell], I think you modified this code last? Any thoughts on which is best?

> With YARN, preferredNodeLocalityData isn't honored 
> ---------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: SPARK-2089
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-2089
>             Project: Spark
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: YARN
>    Affects Versions: 1.0.0
>            Reporter: Sandy Ryza
>            Priority: Critical
>
> When running in YARN cluster mode, apps can pass preferred locality data when 
> constructing a Spark context that will dictate where to request executor 
> containers.
> This is currently broken because of a race condition.  The Spark-YARN code 
> runs the user class and waits for it to start up a SparkContext.  During its 
> initialization, the SparkContext will create a YarnClusterScheduler, which 
> notifies a monitor in the Spark-YARN code that .  The Spark-Yarn code then 
> immediately fetches the preferredNodeLocationData from the SparkContext and 
> uses it to start requesting containers.
> But in the SparkContext constructor that takes the preferredNodeLocationData, 
> setting preferredNodeLocationData comes after the rest of the initialization, 
> so, if the Spark-YARN code comes around quickly enough after being notified, 
> the data that's fetched is the empty unset version.  The occurred during all 
> of my runs.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2#6252)

Reply via email to