[
https://issues.apache.org/struts/browse/WW-2770?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=44576#action_44576
]
newton_dave edited comment on WW-2770 at 8/19/08 9:07 AM:
----------------------------------------------------------
This cannot possibly be a "critical" issue; "critical" should be reserved for
things that actually affect normal operation rather than personal preference.
Using a name rather than a class allows for trivial implementation changes,
just like the naming of spring beans. Feel free to append a patch, however; it
will be reviewed and discussed.
was (Author: newton_dave):
This can't possibly be a "critical" issue; "critical" should be reserved
for things that actually affect normal operation rather than personal
preference.
Using a name rather than a class allows for trivial implementation changes,
just like the naming of spring beans. Feel free to append a patch, however; it
will be reviewed and discussed.
> @Result type should be a class
> ------------------------------
>
> Key: WW-2770
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/struts/browse/WW-2770
> Project: Struts 2
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: Plugin - Convention
> Reporter: Richard Wallace
> Priority: Critical
>
> It feels like a huge step backwards from the Codebehind plugin to use a
> string as the type parameter to the @Result annotation. I much prefer the
> type safety and IDE support provided by using the actual result class. The
> same can be said of the interceptor annotations.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
