[
https://issues.apache.org/struts/browse/WW-2770?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Richard Wallace updated WW-2770:
--------------------------------
Priority: Minor (was: Critical)
Sorry, I must have accidentally set it to critical. I'll have a go at
implementing this. Actually, if it were an Object then devs could use either a
String or a Class and it would be more compatible with the Codebehind plugin.
WDYT?
> @Result type should be a class
> ------------------------------
>
> Key: WW-2770
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/struts/browse/WW-2770
> Project: Struts 2
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: Plugin - Convention
> Reporter: Richard Wallace
> Priority: Minor
>
> It feels like a huge step backwards from the Codebehind plugin to use a
> string as the type parameter to the @Result annotation. I much prefer the
> type safety and IDE support provided by using the actual result class. The
> same can be said of the interceptor annotations.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
