Oswald Buddenhagen <[email protected]> writes: > On Fri, Jun 13, 2014 at 09:47:49AM +0200, Jan Synacek wrote: >> I've implemented GSSAPI support for isync. I was a bit unsure about the >> ifdefs and how to structure them, since I use EVP_DecodeBlock() to >> decode base64, which means dependency on OpenSSL. Consider this patch >> version 1. >> > just a partial review for now. > > note that there is also a sasl branch in git. you can take a lot from > the commit and also the review in the commit message. > ideally, revive it as well.
It looks like the sasl code does slightly more than mine, and is simpler. Reviving the branch makes sense to me. Just to be sure. Do you prefer the sasl implementation, or pure GSSAPI? -- Jan Synacek Software Engineer, Red Hat ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Open source business process management suite built on Java and Eclipse Turn processes into business applications with Bonita BPM Community Edition Quickly connect people, data, and systems into organized workflows Winner of BOSSIE, CODIE, OW2 and Gartner awards http://p.sf.net/sfu/Bonitasoft _______________________________________________ isync-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/isync-devel
