On Mon, Sep 08, 2014 at 01:02:30PM +0200, Jan Synacek wrote: > Oswald Buddenhagen <[email protected]> writes: > >On Fri, Jul 04, 2014 at 11:29:52AM +0200, Jan Synacek wrote: > >> Here's second version of my patch. I decided to kind of revive (I > >> cleaned it up a lot) the original sasl branch. Since the SASL support > >> will already be there, I don't think it makes sense to have additional > >> code for GSSAPI only. > >> > > so i finally had a go at it. > > the sasl branch contains my new version (on top of a lot of ssl stuff > > which is basically totally unrelated, but which i found the need for > > while trying to understand the surrounding code :D). > > it's tested with PLAIN (and LOGIN). > > I just noticed this... I'm not subscribed to the mailing list and I > wasn't on the CC. > > Your implementation misses GSSAPI support, which is the main reason for > my original patch. > ehm. have you tried?
> Please, keep me updated. > > Cheers, > -- > Jan Synacek > Software Engineer, Red Hat > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Want excitement? Manually upgrade your production database. When you want reliability, choose Perforce. Perforce version control. Predictably reliable. http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=157508191&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk _______________________________________________ isync-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/isync-devel
