On Mon, 06 Jul 2026 at 14:51:12 +0200, Oswald Buddenhagen wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 06, 2026 at 01:59:47PM +1000, Seth McDonald wrote:
> > On Sun, 05 Jul 2026 at 12:46:14 +0200, Oswald Buddenhagen wrote:
> > > > The patch had two goals:
> > > > 1) Un-intertwine the current two implementations.
> > > > it doesn't achieve that to any appreciable degree. the cyrus
> > > implementation
> > > still hard-codes the login special case,
> >
> > Yes, both implementations (Cyrus & simple) share the LOGIN logic. But I
> > fail to see how having some logic in common means the goal overall is
> > not met.
> >
> how can you admit that cyrus and login are still tangled but claim that the
> objective of untangling was achieved?
I think I see the miscommunication here. My goal was to _visually_
un-intertwine the current two implementations.
Take care,
Seth McDonald.
--
E9D1 26A5 F0D4 9DF7 792B C2E2 B4BF 4530 D39B 2D51
_______________________________________________
isync-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/isync-devel
