On Mar 5, 2008, at 4:38 AM, Sérgio Oliveira wrote:
> => "we understand that there ARE scenarios"... Leonard this
> "scenarios" are business scenarios. In my opinion Adobe is
> minimizing this "scenarios" because they are still thinking as a
> "desktop" mind. I think that more than ever, the future of Adobe is
> in those business scenarios, because if not why the existience of
> LiveCycle Products? Those at home that open sometimes a pdf file
> are not the real costumers. And if you go see the implementations
> of Livecycle they are specially directed to Intranets. So, one more
> reason to consider those scenarios.
>
We agree 100%!
And as I said to you, we WILL be delivering a solution that address
these needs. It's just not there today. I am sorry that you have
run into one of the cases where we broke something before delivering
a fix - it sucks, I know - I feel your pain!!
> Moreover I doubt that the idea to protect by itself a PDF file it
> is a good idea. One should use the infrasturcture of the machine
> and of the communications (ex.: anti-virus; SSL; etc.).
One should use both...
> I don´t even talk about the digital signatures and how they are
> implemented in PDF files: for each digital signature the size of
> the PDF is almost double sized.
That was a bug in an older (7.x) version of Acrobat.
> As for the use of folder scripts, I forgot to say that the function
> needs to be a trusted function. I THINK this will work.
>
Yes, folder scripts (because they can't be sent via email) are trusted.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
_______________________________________________
iText-questions mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/itext-questions
Buy the iText book: http://itext.ugent.be/itext-in-action/
