On Wed, Jun 17, 2015 at 2:55 PM, Milind Gupta <milind.gu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > On Wed, Jun 17, 2015 at 2:55 PM, Milind Gupta <milind.gu...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> >> >> On Wed, Jun 17, 2015 at 2:54 PM, Milind Gupta <milind.gu...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >>> Resending my previous email since it exceeded the size limit for the >>> list. I will include the attachments in the following emails. >>> >>> Hi Antonio, >>> Thanks for the quick reply. I modified the program (as you >>> suggested - attached). When I start the program and the dlg:show calls the >>> resizematrix_cb for matA I see the values as shown in the attached image >>> watch1. >>> >>> So now here is the 1st thing I don't understand. Why is matC which has >>> more columns has a natural size in X which is smaller than matA which has 1 >>> less column? This is even before I do any modifications to the sizes of the >>> columns. >>> >>> Now as soon as I resize matA rows and columns with my resize >>> calculations the matA naturalsize and rastersize get bigger. So somehow >>> something is not right in my calculations. Let me repeat my calculation >>> rules I use: >>> >>> 1. Every cell has 8 pixels of decoration in X and in Y direction. >>> 2. The matrix has a border of 2 >>> 3. rastersize is the actual size of the matrix control I can use when I >>> include the matrix control border (2) and decoration for each cell (8) >>> 4. rasterheightX and rasterwidthX gives the size of the cell after >>> removing the decoration part (8). >>> >>> So with a rastersize dimension of X and n cells of dimensions >>> x1,x2,...xn the following is true: >>> X = 2+x1+x2+...+xn+8*n >>> >>> Is this not right? I am forcing the scroll bar to autohide by setting dx >>> = xmax-xmin and dy=ymax-ymin. >>> >>> After I just resize matA cells (matC is not resized) the values change >>> to as shown in the attached image watch2. My calculation distributed >>> 459 to each cell width since it satisfied the equation 936 = 2+ 459*2 + 8*2 >>> and the rows are 10 and 488 since they satisfy the equation 516 = 2 + >>> 10+488+8*2 but when I do that the rastersize of A has changed from 936x516 >>> to 1010x531. I am not able to explain this. >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Milind >>> >>> On Wed, Jun 17, 2015 at 10:21 AM, Antonio Scuri < >>> sc...@tecgraf.puc-rio.br> wrote: >>> >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> I didn't check all your calculations, but did you noticed that when >>>> the dialog is resize you do the FitMat* twice? When MatA is resized, you >>>> compute both, then MatC is also resized and you compute both again. >>>> >>>> I think it would more interesting to set the size only of the >>>> respective metrix inside resizematrix_cb. >>>> >>>> And if the size is growing this means that you are setting a >>>> combination of sizes that are larger than the current size. Must recheck >>>> those calculations. Try inspecting the new sizes and comparing them to the >>>> calculated size. >>>> >>>> Best, >>>> Scuri >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On Wed, Jun 17, 2015 at 12:50 PM, Milind Gupta <milind.gu...@gmail.com> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> I think the problem may be occurring because of the following which I >>>>> don't understand: >>>>> >>>>> I have a iuptabs control that starts off with a size of 776x361 >>>>> clientsize (which is the same as either matrix rastersize.) I have 2 >>>>> matrix >>>>> controls in the 2 tabs and I resize its rows and columns as follows: >>>>> >>>>> matA has 2 rows (including title) and 2 columns (no column title). >>>>> Title row rasterheight = 10 (fixed) row 1 rasterheight = 333 (adjusted to >>>>> occupy the remaining height of the matrix). This should give the total >>>>> matrix height of 333+10+2*8+2 = 361 which matches the height of the >>>>> matrix. >>>>> (2 is for the border and 8 for the cell decorations) >>>>> >>>>> matA has 2 columns with no title. Both columns are distributed the >>>>> space equally. So their rasterwidth is set to 379 both. That should give >>>>> the total matrix width of: >>>>> 379*2+2*8+2 = 776 which matches the width of the matrix >>>>> >>>>> matC has 2 rows same as matA and they are given the same size of 10 >>>>> and 333 >>>>> >>>>> matC has 3 columns. 1st column is fixed at 12 the remaining 2 columns >>>>> get the space equally and are set to 369. This should give the matrix >>>>> width >>>>> of: >>>>> 369*2+8*3+12+2 = 776 which matches the width of the matrix >>>>> >>>>> *After these sizings happen the natural size and rastersize of matA >>>>> changes to 850x376 and the natural size of matC changes to 791x376 while >>>>> its rastersize if 850x376. The iuptabs natural size and rastersize changes >>>>> to 858x407* >>>>> >>>>> I don't understand why does the natural and rastersize of the matrix >>>>> elements and iuptabs change when I resize the columns to precisely fit in >>>>> their current rastersize? Am I calculating something wrong here? >>>>> >>>>> Thanks for any help. >>>>> >>>>> Milind >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Tue, Jun 16, 2015 at 11:41 PM, Milind Gupta <milind.gu...@gmail.com >>>>> > wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Hi, >>>>>> I have this sample attached. The aim is to resize the matrix >>>>>> columns and cells automatically depending on the weight assigned to the >>>>>> columns whenever the dialog is resized. The sizing algorithm works fine >>>>>> when I trace the steps of the sizes allotted to different columns. >>>>>> The problem is that after a few resize iterations the iuptab >>>>>> size suddenly becomes larger than the dialog clientsize. I am not able to >>>>>> explain that and that causes the automatic resizing of the matrix not to >>>>>> work as intended. >>>>>> I would really appreciate any help as to why the tabs size >>>>>> increases beyond the dialog client size. >>>>>> >>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>> Milind >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> Iup-users mailing list >>>>> Iup-users@lists.sourceforge.net >>>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/iup-users >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Iup-users mailing list >>>> Iup-users@lists.sourceforge.net >>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/iup-users >>>> >>>> >>> >> >
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________ Iup-users mailing list Iup-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/iup-users
