Thanks. I guess it is correct. I made some small changes during the build because of compilation problems so I don't know exactly which revision.
Best, Scuri Em ter., 19 de mai. de 2020 às 03:47, sur-behoffski < sur_behoff...@grouse.com.au> escreveu: > On 2020-05-19 12:13, Antonio Scuri wrote: > > Hi All, > > > > We just released IUP version 3.29 > > > > [...] > > > > You can find the complete list of changes and files for download at: > > > > http://www.tecgraf.puc-rio.br/iup/ > > http://iup.sourceforge.net/ > > > > Best Regards, > > Antonio Scuri > > G'day Antonio (and the entire Tecgraf/others team), > > Congratulations on the new release. > > Just for my ("automated assistant") records, which Subversion > revision is the basis for this release? I've been tracking the > Subversion repositories closely, and I believe that for IUP: > > local iup = { > -- [...] Other stuff > Releases = { > -- [...] Earlier releases > {5175, "3.27", "2019-04-30T17:14:40.901290Z"}, > {5541, "3.28", "2019-12-14T01:34:48.580849Z"}, > {5817, "3.29", "2020-05-18T20:28:55.183309Z"}, > }, > } > > i.e. IUP-r5817 is the basis for the release -- 5 months since 3.28, > and over 12 months since 3.27. Is this correct? > > cheers, > > s-b etc etc > > > _______________________________________________ > Iup-users mailing list > Iup-users@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/iup-users >
_______________________________________________ Iup-users mailing list Iup-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/iup-users
