On Monday 03 October 2005 18:10, Jesse Guardiani wrote:
> Hans Verkuil wrote:
> > Should we still continue the 0.2 branch? My personal opinion is that once
> > 0.3.9 is released (I'm tentatively aiming for next weekend) that should
> > become the new stable series. Anything that 0.2 does better than 0.3.9
> > should be fixed in 0.3.9 rather than keeping 0.2 alive.
> >
> > The only thing I am aware of is that there are still some rare video
> > artefacts occuring in 0.3.9 that do not appear in 0.2 (or early 0.3 for
> > that matter). Leonard Orb is trying to determine where that was
> > introduced. Does anyone know of other areas where 0.2 is better than the
> > current svn trunk version?
> >
> > What is the general opinion on abandoning the 0.2 branch in favor of 0.3?
>
> I see a lot of complaints from 0.2.x users regarding regression, but
> that's the whole point
> of a 0.3.x freeze. Only bug fixes go into the code base. New features go
> into 0.4.x.
>
> My opinion? Go for it Hans! (BTW, you're doing a kick-a$$ job! I don't
> think the user base can
> express in words how much we appreciate the effort. How can we send a
> donation to you?)
See, I knew I read something about donations! :-) I used to have an Amazon
wishlist, but Amazon tends to be expensive for small items. It's best to
contact me, I usually have some DVDs or books that I'd like to have. Or
perhaps some inexpensive hardware.
Hans
_______________________________________________
ivtv-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://ivtvdriver.org/mailman/listinfo/ivtv-devel
