Bryan Mayland wrote: > After working this out out loud, it becomes obvious that we should check > for skip and increment each modules i2c_enabled at the same time we > print out "starting probe for adapter ivtv i2c ...". This would occur > only if the adapter flags are right (ALGO_BIT | HW_B_BT848) so we don't > increment for other busses (like the Intel i810 a lot of us have). > > I think this would prevent modules' i2c_enabled indexes from getting out > of sync depending on module load order and card init order. Am I on > base with this? I will submit a patch.
Sounds right to me. -- Tyler Trafford ------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net email is sponsored by: Discover Easy Linux Migration Strategies from IBM. Find simple to follow Roadmaps, straightforward articles, informative Webcasts and more! Get everything you need to get up to speed, fast. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_idt77&alloc_id492&op=click _______________________________________________ ivtv-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ivtv-devel
