Kirk Bocek wrote: > > John Drescher wrote: >> On 10/2/07, Kirk Bocek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> I'm finding the quality of the image captured by my PVR-500 tuners (via the >>> 'cat /dev/videox' method) to be pretty poor. The best I can describe is that >>> it is noisy or 'blocky' or grainy. The problem is on both tuners. >>> >> Can you post a sample on a web site or a free download site as >> attachments on this list are limited to 40K? A screen capture will >> probably be good enough. > > I sent this once as an attachment but that's been blocked for administrator > approval. Try this: > > http://www.kbocek.com/vlcsnap-2305977.jpg > > The image has been cropped to keep it under > 40k. Some of the noise is interlacing in this picture. If you look further you > can see a sort of blocky noise that just isn't present in the streams I > capture off of the digital channels. Seems I should be able to do better with > the PVR-500.
And for comparison sake, take a look at: http://www.kbocek.com/vlcsnap-2320059.jpg which was captured through the S-video input with the image coming from my cable box. Much, much cleaner. Am I wrong to think I should be able to get something similar from the analog tuners? _______________________________________________ ivtv-users mailing list [email protected] http://ivtvdriver.org/mailman/listinfo/ivtv-users
