Xavier Hanin wrote:
On 11/24/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>If it's possible to have several modules like that, it would
>be nice. But would the ASF be ok for that? Do we have to
>submit another proposal? Is eclipse dependency ok according to
>ASF licensing policy?
While I dont know the policy enough, I think having a 2nd proposal and a
2nd project would be too much work. Should be done inside this proposal.
I agree. Could someone else confirm it makes sense to migrate IvyDE as a
sub
module of Ivy?
Yes, it makes good sense. From an ASF point of view it is fine, however,
I gather from this discussion that the IvyDE code was not a part of the
IVY codebase that was the subject of the original proposal. With this in
mind, I would recommend posting to the [EMAIL PROTECTED] list stating your
intentions and stating that lazy consensus is in operation, in other
words, you will go ahead with bringing over the code unless someone
objects within 3 days (possibly longer it being a weekend).
Alternatively, wait for an answer from one of your official mentors.
Of course, you will have to ensure all relevant license grants were in
place before copying code over.
Finally, as a new user of Ivy and IvyDE, I would encourage this move.
Ross
