Xavier Hanin wrote:
On 11/24/06, Ross Gardler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Xavier Hanin wrote:
> On 11/24/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>>
>> >If it's possible to have several modules like that, it would
>> >be nice. But would the ASF be ok for that? Do we have to
>> >submit another proposal? Is eclipse dependency ok according to
>> >ASF licensing policy?
>>
>> While I dont know the policy enough, I think having a 2nd proposal and
a
>>
>> 2nd project would be too much work. Should be done inside this
proposal.
>
>
> I agree. Could someone else confirm it makes sense to migrate IvyDE
as a
> sub
> module of Ivy?
Yes, it makes good sense. From an ASF point of view it is fine, however,
I gather from this discussion that the IvyDE code was not a part of the
IVY codebase that was the subject of the original proposal. With this in
mind, I would recommend posting to the [EMAIL PROTECTED] list stating your
intentions and stating that lazy consensus is in operation, in other
words, you will go ahead with bringing over the code unless someone
objects within 3 days (possibly longer it being a weekend).
Alternatively, wait for an answer from one of your official mentors.
Ok, I'll first wait for an answer from at least one mentor, and then
send an
e-mail to the [EMAIL PROTECTED] list to see if there is no objection.
go for it :)
