Guys, is it relevant/helpful that commons-vfs-1.0 was released recently? http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=jakarta-announce&m=116750017315311&w=2
-Matt --- Xavier Hanin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 1/9/07, Maarten Coene <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > > > I've fixed the problem on my local machine. > > I've manually created the > commons-vfs-sandbox-1.0.jar and added it to the > > ivy project. This is necessary because the > commons-vfs-sandbox-1.0.jarisn't available as > download. > > > > Is it ok if I put this jar in the ivy SVN? > > > I don't know for legal stuff or things like that, > but I'm not fan of putting > dependency jar in SVN. Hey, that's why I wrote Ivy > :-) I'd prefer storing it > on a web site, as is done for current version of vfs > used in Ivy (a nightly > build). But maybe there's an issue with gump? > > Xavier > > regards, > > Maarten > > > > ----- Original Message ---- > > From: Maarten Coene <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > To: [email protected] > > Sent: Tuesday, January 9, 2007 10:14:56 PM > > Subject: Re: package rename > > > > Hi, > > > > I didn't let gump send mails to ivy-commits yet. I > wanted to wait untill > > the ivy gump build was succesfull to avoid all > these gump mails telling Ivy > > couldn't be build. But if you don't mind getting > all these mails, I'll > > change it. > > > > One major problem at the moment which is blocking > a successfull build is > > the "VFS sandbox"-dependency which isn't available > in gump yet. > > > > Maarten > > > > ----- Original Message ---- > > From: Steve Loughran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > To: [email protected] > > Sent: Tuesday, January 9, 2007 2:52:40 PM > > Subject: Re: package rename > > > > > > On a related note, what is the gump status? I see > that gump mails go to > > maarten, instead of the group. That should be > changed to go to ivy-dev > > or ivy-commits. > > > > I have some gump projects that run off a snapshot > of gump 1.4.1 in my > > own SCM repository. Is it time to move to SVN_HEAD > gump? How stable has > > gump been with Ivy builds so far? > > > > -steve > > > > > > > > > > > > __________________________________________________ > > Do You Yahoo!? > > Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam > protection around > > http://mail.yahoo.com > > > > > > > > > > __________________________________________________ > > Do You Yahoo!? > > Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam > protection around > > http://mail.yahoo.com > > > __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com
