On 1/10/07, Maarten Coene <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
That release is the problem! VFS is splitted into 2 parts: commons-vfs-1.0.jar and commons-vfs-sandbox-1.0.jar (see the new on http://jakarta.apache.org/commons/vfs/ ) The sandbox jar contains the webdav functionality, which is needed to compile ivy (webdav). The first jar is available on the apache download site and ibiblio. The sandbox jar isn't available: it isn't on apache, it isn't on ibiblio. Also, no nightly build is available neither. If the sandbox jar was availabe somewhere, there wasn't a problem. If you just change the revision of the VFS dependency in ivy.xml to "1.0", you'll notice that ivy doesn't compile any longer. The snapshot used at the moment is rather old and contains both the core and the sandbox part. Gump tries to use the latest VFS code, which is splitted into core and sandbox. But since sandbox isn't available, gump cannot compile ivy. But anyway, we should also try to use this VFS 1.0release instead of a VFS snapshot. Other solutions are: - place the commons-vfs-sandbox-1.0.jar somewhere accessible through http (but this won't solve the gump problems) - remove the webdav related code from ivy (which is actually a workaround to make VFS work with http-client-3).
We can also put this code in a separate source directory (like src/ext for instance) and do not compile it until we find a solution. Xavier Maarten
----- Original Message ---- From: Matt Benson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [email protected] Sent: Wednesday, January 10, 2007 12:08:43 AM Subject: Re: package rename Guys, is it relevant/helpful that commons-vfs-1.0 was released recently? http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=jakarta-announce&m=116750017315311&w=2 -Matt --- Xavier Hanin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 1/9/07, Maarten Coene <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > > > I've fixed the problem on my local machine. > > I've manually created the > commons-vfs-sandbox-1.0.jar and added it to the > > ivy project. This is necessary because the > commons-vfs-sandbox-1.0.jarisn't available as > download. > > > > Is it ok if I put this jar in the ivy SVN? > > > I don't know for legal stuff or things like that, > but I'm not fan of putting > dependency jar in SVN. Hey, that's why I wrote Ivy > :-) I'd prefer storing it > on a web site, as is done for current version of vfs > used in Ivy (a nightly > build). But maybe there's an issue with gump? > > Xavier > > regards, > > Maarten > > > > ----- Original Message ---- > > From: Maarten Coene <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > To: [email protected] > > Sent: Tuesday, January 9, 2007 10:14:56 PM > > Subject: Re: package rename > > > > Hi, > > > > I didn't let gump send mails to ivy-commits yet. I > wanted to wait untill > > the ivy gump build was succesfull to avoid all > these gump mails telling Ivy > > couldn't be build. But if you don't mind getting > all these mails, I'll > > change it. > > > > One major problem at the moment which is blocking > a successfull build is > > the "VFS sandbox"-dependency which isn't available > in gump yet. > > > > Maarten > > > > ----- Original Message ---- > > From: Steve Loughran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > To: [email protected] > > Sent: Tuesday, January 9, 2007 2:52:40 PM > > Subject: Re: package rename > > > > > > On a related note, what is the gump status? I see > that gump mails go to > > maarten, instead of the group. That should be > changed to go to ivy-dev > > or ivy-commits. > > > > I have some gump projects that run off a snapshot > of gump 1.4.1 in my > > own SCM repository. Is it time to move to SVN_HEAD > gump? How stable has > > gump been with Ivy builds so far? > > > > -steve > > > > > > > > > > > > __________________________________________________ > > Do You Yahoo!? > > Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam > protection around > > http://mail.yahoo.com > > > > > > > > > > __________________________________________________ > > Do You Yahoo!? > > Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam > protection around > > http://mail.yahoo.com > > > __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com
