Fine for me. If no one objects, I'll move them to src/sandbox Maarten
----- Original Message ---- From: Xavier Hanin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [email protected] Sent: Wednesday, January 10, 2007 5:48:18 PM Subject: Re: upgrade to VFS 1.0 (was Re: package rename) On 1/10/07, Maarten Coene <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > That release is the problem! VFS is splitted into 2 parts: > commons-vfs-1.0.jar and commons-vfs-sandbox-1.0.jar > (see the new on http://jakarta.apache.org/commons/vfs/ ) > > The sandbox jar contains the webdav functionality, which is needed to > compile ivy (webdav). > The first jar is available on the apache download site and ibiblio. The > sandbox jar isn't available: it isn't on apache, it isn't on ibiblio. Also, > no nightly build is available neither. If the sandbox jar was availabe > somewhere, there wasn't a problem. If you just change the revision of the > VFS dependency in ivy.xml to "1.0", you'll notice that ivy doesn't compile > any longer. > > The snapshot used at the moment is rather old and contains both the core > and the sandbox part. Gump tries to use the latest VFS code, which is > splitted into core and sandbox. But since sandbox isn't available, gump > cannot compile ivy. But anyway, we should also try to use this VFS 1.0release > instead of a VFS snapshot. > > Other solutions are: > - place the commons-vfs-sandbox-1.0.jar somewhere accessible through http > (but this won't solve the gump problems) > - remove the webdav related code from ivy (which is actually a workaround > to make VFS work with http-client-3). We can also put this code in a separate source directory (like src/ext for instance) and do not compile it until we find a solution. Xavier Maarten > > > ----- Original Message ---- > From: Matt Benson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: [email protected] > Sent: Wednesday, January 10, 2007 12:08:43 AM > Subject: Re: package rename > > Guys, is it relevant/helpful that commons-vfs-1.0 was > released recently? > > http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=jakarta-announce&m=116750017315311&w=2 > > -Matt > > --- Xavier Hanin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On 1/9/07, Maarten Coene <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > wrote: > > > > > > I've fixed the problem on my local machine. > > > I've manually created the > > commons-vfs-sandbox-1.0.jar and added it to the > > > ivy project. This is necessary because the > > commons-vfs-sandbox-1.0.jarisn't available as > > download. > > > > > > Is it ok if I put this jar in the ivy SVN? > > > > > > I don't know for legal stuff or things like that, > > but I'm not fan of putting > > dependency jar in SVN. Hey, that's why I wrote Ivy > > :-) I'd prefer storing it > > on a web site, as is done for current version of vfs > > used in Ivy (a nightly > > build). But maybe there's an issue with gump? > > > > Xavier > > > > regards, > > > Maarten > > > > > > ----- Original Message ---- > > > From: Maarten Coene <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > To: [email protected] > > > Sent: Tuesday, January 9, 2007 10:14:56 PM > > > Subject: Re: package rename > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > I didn't let gump send mails to ivy-commits yet. I > > wanted to wait untill > > > the ivy gump build was succesfull to avoid all > > these gump mails telling Ivy > > > couldn't be build. But if you don't mind getting > > all these mails, I'll > > > change it. > > > > > > One major problem at the moment which is blocking > > a successfull build is > > > the "VFS sandbox"-dependency which isn't available > > in gump yet. > > > > > > Maarten > > > > > > ----- Original Message ---- > > > From: Steve Loughran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > To: [email protected] > > > Sent: Tuesday, January 9, 2007 2:52:40 PM > > > Subject: Re: package rename > > > > > > > > > On a related note, what is the gump status? I see > > that gump mails go to > > > maarten, instead of the group. That should be > > changed to go to ivy-dev > > > or ivy-commits. > > > > > > I have some gump projects that run off a snapshot > > of gump 1.4.1 in my > > > own SCM repository. Is it time to move to SVN_HEAD > > gump? How stable has > > > gump been with Ivy builds so far? > > > > > > -steve > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > __________________________________________________ > > > Do You Yahoo!? > > > Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam > > protection around > > > http://mail.yahoo.com > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > __________________________________________________ > > > Do You Yahoo!? > > > Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam > > protection around > > > http://mail.yahoo.com > > > > > > > > __________________________________________________ > Do You Yahoo!? > Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around > http://mail.yahoo.com > > > > > __________________________________________________ > Do You Yahoo!? > Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around > http://mail.yahoo.com > ____________________________________________________________________________________ Cheap talk? Check out Yahoo! Messenger's low PC-to-Phone call rates. http://voice.yahoo.com
