2007/5/31, Xavier Hanin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
On 5/31/07, Xavier Hanin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> We discussed recently about using the eclipse tool to clean up the code to
> decrease our number of checkstyle errors/warnings.
>
> Gilles now you have committed your changes, could we agree on a day where
> we could make sure we have no pending changes so that one of us can run the
> tool and commit the cleaned up code without needing a merge?
>
> Before we should apply the patch from Stephane:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IVY-518
>
> On my side I have no pending changes, so any day is ok. I'm ok to apply
> the patch and run the clean up tool, I will have time to do it next week. If
> anybody else prefer to do it, I'd be happy to oblige :-)
>
> We also have to agree on maximum line length, is 100 (the current setting
> of checkstyle, borrowed from Ant) ok for everybody?


+1 Yes, if it is right for ant people, it should be right for us as well.

A collegue told me once that if your lines are longer, then it is time
to refactor.  I think he was right.


One more thing: I think it will be a good opportunity to fix our eol
inconsistencies: using fixcrlf + applying svn:eol-style property.
Committers, maybe we should use the Apache settings for svn, to auto apply
eol-style:
http://www.apache.org/dev/svn-eol-style.txt


+1
But not that this config will only impact new files.  The property
must still be placed on the existing sources.

Gilles

--
Gilles SCOKART

Reply via email to