On 6/7/07, Gilles Scokart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

In our checkstyle config we have the rule 'RedundantModifier'.  (see
http://checkstyle.sourceforge.net/config_modifier.html).



Did we really want to keep this rule?  If you want to keep it, it's ok,
we can keep it.  But if you have no preference, I would prefer to not
use this rule.



Personally, I prefer to see public in front of a public method even when
the method is declared in an interface and the public keyword is
implicit.  I think it make it more clear.



WDYT?


I have no preference at all, so if you prefer seeing public in front of
interface methods it's fine for me.

Xavier

Gilles

Gilles Scokart

E-mail : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tel   : +32
Fax  : +32


Isabel NV/S.A.
Keizerinlaan 13-15 Boulevard de l'Imperatrice
1000 Brussels - Belgium
RPR Bruxelles / RPM Brussel: BE 0455 530 509
www.isabel.eu     www.zoomit.eu

ZOOMIT is a Registred Trademark of Isabel NV/S.A.
Disclaimer : www.isabel.eu/gps/en/disclaimer/mailing.php




--
Xavier Hanin - Independent Java Consultant
Manage your dependencies with Ivy!
http://incubator.apache.org/ivy/

Reply via email to